Skip to content

20260818 – The State Said No. The Grants Were Federal.

On Aug. 18, a federal court hearing in Colorado surfaced a December email that made an already contentious federal-state dispute more structurally legible. Colorado had made decisions the federal executive could not directly reverse. The… 

20260810 – When the Court Can Only Preserve the Record

After presidential commutations left the Jan. 6 convictions intact, the Justice Department used appellate vacatur and dismissal with prejudice to erase the convictions and foreclose renewed prosecution. With prosecution and defense aligned on that result,… 

20260806 – When the Plaintiff Controls the Defense

A court exposed the absence of genuine adversity, Senate leverage forced the rescission of a $1.8 billion fund, and the remaining tax protection entered legal limbo. On July 31, the plaintiffs in President Trump’s lawsuit… 

20260720 – When the Safer Error Is Denial

July 20, 2026 — Arizona’s SNAP enrollment fell by about half in less than a year, removing roughly 440,000 people from the program. For many, the legal entitlement remained. What changed was the cost of… 

20260723 – The Safeguard That Had to Be Activated

July 23, 2026 – The Justice Department withdrew subpoenas seeking phone records and grand jury testimony from New York Times journalists who had reported on the security capabilities of President Trump’s new Air Force One.… 

20260710 – When Election Security Requires Alignment

July 10, 2026 — President Trump removed the remaining members of the Election Assistance Commission, leaving the bipartisan federal body without any commissioners months before the midterm elections. The White House said the president could… 

20260713 – The Lawsuit With No Opposing Side

July 13, 2026 — A federal judge ruled that President Trump’s lawsuit against the Internal Revenue Service was not a genuine dispute between opposing parties. Trump was suing an agency within the executive branch he…